Reporters Without Borders today welcomed the decision by Senator
Expedito Júnior to withdraw a law he put forward in December 2007,
which would have increased prison sentences for press offences
committed online.
The federal senator for Rondônia in western Brazil restated his commitment to press freedom in an open letter published today in the daily O Estado de São Paulo.
The federal senator for Rondônia in western Brazil restated his commitment to press freedom in an open letter published today in the daily O Estado de São Paulo.
He said in the letter that the objective of his draft law had
been to prevent a proliferation of blogs and websites solely intended
to "damage someone's reputation", but the controversy stirred up by his
proposal had persuaded him of the risks of "mistaken interpretations".
"Good intentions don't necessarily make good laws," the worldwide press freedom organisation said. "Senator Expédito Júnior was right to be angry about a warped use of the Internet by unscrupulous individuals to sully the reputation of other people, through racist hatred, homophobia or incitement to paedophilia."
"We do not question the parliamentarian's commitment to press freedom and his decision proves it. We are nevertheless convinced that this freedom would have been harmed if the draft law had been voted through. It also went against the trend of decriminalisation of press offences, which began with the partial suspension by the federal supreme court of the 1967 press law."
"This legacy from the military dictatorship could soon be abolished with the adoption of a draft law put forward by the deputy, Miro Teixeira," the organisation concluded.
The proposal made by Expedito Júnior would have increased by one third prison sentences against Internet-users found guilty of "damage to reputation" and would have made it easier for police to obtain evidence, by giving them the power to print out incriminating online articles to be produced in court as evidence. The controversy surrounding his bill led Expedito Júnior to call for public hearing before the Senate, a request which was refused by the Senator spearheading the law, Eduardo Azeredo.
"Good intentions don't necessarily make good laws," the worldwide press freedom organisation said. "Senator Expédito Júnior was right to be angry about a warped use of the Internet by unscrupulous individuals to sully the reputation of other people, through racist hatred, homophobia or incitement to paedophilia."
"We do not question the parliamentarian's commitment to press freedom and his decision proves it. We are nevertheless convinced that this freedom would have been harmed if the draft law had been voted through. It also went against the trend of decriminalisation of press offences, which began with the partial suspension by the federal supreme court of the 1967 press law."
"This legacy from the military dictatorship could soon be abolished with the adoption of a draft law put forward by the deputy, Miro Teixeira," the organisation concluded.
The proposal made by Expedito Júnior would have increased by one third prison sentences against Internet-users found guilty of "damage to reputation" and would have made it easier for police to obtain evidence, by giving them the power to print out incriminating online articles to be produced in court as evidence. The controversy surrounding his bill led Expedito Júnior to call for public hearing before the Senate, a request which was refused by the Senator spearheading the law, Eduardo Azeredo.
« previous/next »
- Prev. entry: Newspaper publisher held incommunicado and reporters attacked on streets as government steps up crackdown on media
- Next entry: LAUNCH OF ONLINE FREE EXPRESSION DAY PLUS REPEAT OF LAST YEAR'S 24-HOUR ONLINE DEMO AGAINST INTERNET CENSORSHIP
- Start here: Main Index
Related entries
No TrackBacks
TrackBack URL: http://www.rog.at/mt/mt-tb.cgi/195
Leave a comment